Science-informed, not clinically diagnostic
The assessment structure draws from relationship science, psychometric design, and decision science, but V1 rules are not presented as validated clinical measures.
Science-informed approach
The platform separates what was measured, what may be interpreted, what is uncertain, and what is worth discussing next.
Consented couple summary
Future alignment
UncertainConflict repair
ModerateChildren
DifferentCritical issues appear separately before any aggregate interpretation.
Method
The product treats major relationship decisions as high-consequence choices under uncertainty, not as personality matching.
The assessment structure draws from relationship science, psychometric design, and decision science, but V1 rules are not presented as validated clinical measures.
High-consequence differences, safety concerns, and low reliability are surfaced separately from dimension summaries.
Readiness, alignment, risk, perception, and reliability are separate outputs. The product avoids flattening a relationship into one score.
If AI-assisted wording is enabled later, it cannot override deterministic scoring, critical gates, consent state, or the user's agency.
Measured
Structured answers, importance, flexibility, confidence, and reliability.
Interpreted
Plain-language summaries that explain uncertainty and decision relevance.
Discussed
Conversation prompts, possible agreements, experiments, and revisit dates.
Boundaries
The platform is built to preserve agency. It offers structure and language, not a verdict about your life.
Not therapy.
Not diagnosis.
Not matchmaking.
Not prediction.
Not a compatibility percentage.
Not a system that tells you whether to marry, separate, cohabit, or have children.
Start entry point
Begin privately. Invite a partner only when you are ready to compare consented summaries.