Partner invitations do not reveal answers
Inviting a partner starts a shared context. It does not expose assessment content.
Sharing and consent
The couple experience is built around consented summaries, clear privacy boundaries, and conversation support that does not reveal raw partner answers.
Consented couple summary
Future alignment
UncertainConflict repair
ModerateChildren
DifferentCritical issues appear separately before any aggregate interpretation.
Sharing rules
The product distinguishes private answers, shared summaries, perception comparisons, critical issues, and guided conversation context.
Inviting a partner starts a shared context. It does not expose assessment content.
Before sharing, users should see what kind of summary will be included and what remains private.
Shared reports use consented summaries, allowed comparisons, deterministic scores, reliability bands, and critical-gate metadata.
Predicted partner answers are compared only when product rules and consent allow comparison.
Critical issues appear above aggregate patterns and are framed calmly as decision-relevant topics.
Guided conversation prompts use only the information allowed by the sharing state.
Consent flow
Comparison happens only after the product can safely say what is shared and what is still private.
Raw individual answers are private by default.
See what could be shared before consenting.
Couple reports use consented summaries and allowed comparisons.
Guided conversations protect pace, agency, and privacy.
Start entry point
You can begin privately and use the consent flow when a shared report is appropriate.